This law is terrible and I hope it isn't implemented, but it's enabled by the locked down and centralized nature of iOS and the way most people get apps on Android, the Play store.

Once you try Android, you can't go back. I used an iPhone all my life, but a few months ago I switched to GrapheneOS and the FOSS software ecosystem is fantastic.

On iPhones, if a government doesn't want an app, like those ICE tracking apps, they can force Apple to remove them and no-one can install them. On Android, I source more than 90% of my apps from GitHub.

Dispelling FUD about Android:

1. The Google locking down Android only affects devices with privileged Play Services. GrapheneOS will not be affected because play services are not installed by default, and if they are installed, they are sandboxed and wouldn't have that authority.

2. If you were on a stock Android distribution, it's not that bad to wait 24 hours once. Yes, Google could make it worse, but that's just speculation. Their monopoly is being challenged to an extent through the GrapheneOS attestation, and will hopefully become illegal under anti trust law.

The change is only in play servics, AOSP takes a lot of steps to protect your privacy.

3. Causes for incompatibility on GrapheneOS are either exploit protections catching problems with an app, which can be disabled, or the app explicitly banning alternative operating systems as security theatre.

Only a small portion of banking and government apps completely ban GrapheneOS. Over 99% of apps are compatible. App developers have to add additional measured to break their app on GrapheneOS. I have over 40 apps and none are broken or have broken.

Some banking apps are officially supporting GrapheneOS through their privacy respecting attestation.

As more people use GrapheneOS, more apps will be pressured to support it. For example, although VW recently banned GrapheneOS, Hyundai and Kia have added express support for GrapheneOS in their apps.

Like a Bouncer at a Bookstore: Texas' App Store Accountability Act